More Microscopic Images of Blood Post-Covid Vaccination

These are screenshots of microscopic blood smears comparing normal red blood cells to post Covid vaccine cells.

normal cells on left, post Moderna vaccine on right

The left image is normal blood cells taken from someone who has not received a Covid-19 vaccine. The right image was taken from someone after they received the Moderna vaccine. There are misformed cells with smaller nuclei and gold-ish rods which could be graphene oxide.

White particles in blood post Covid vaccine

This shows white dots that light up. They could be quantum dots or an effect from Luciferase. Maybe this is how they will be able to know who’s received the vaccines.

Very irregular blood cells post Covid vaccine, clumping together
Very irregular jagged and clumped together red blood cells

Video from Stew Peters TV

Contact information:

http://www.StewPeters.tv

http://www.DrJaneRuby.com

Covid Vaccine Death Coverup

Sharing this alarming article from virginastoner.com

“We’re not talking about a modest increase in death reports, something we might chat about in concerned voices over Chai tea and bagels at a company mixer. We’re talking about a huge and unprecedented increase—so massive that in the last 4 months alone, VAERS has received over 40% of all death reports it has ever received in its entire 30+year history. So massive it’s literally “off the chart.” The first chart in the pair below shows VAERS death reports from 2014 thru 2020. If you tried to add the 2021 data to it, it would be way, way off the chart. The second chart shows how much detail was lost when the 2021 data was squeezed in. “
Continue Reading    

Are Injections The Mark Of The Beast?

I just finished watching a six hour documentary (attached below) and I’m convinced they are in fact the mark everyone should want to avoid. To be honest, I was already convinced before watching it, but it further cemented my belief. It’s very upsetting because we all know so many who have taken the injections, hoping life will return to normal.

My belief is based on hours of research, but is also based on an overwhelming gut feeling. When this whole thing started last March I could sense the presence of evil almost overnight. I knew this was never about a vir#s. I blogged about it when we were weeks into it. The article was titled “Global Psychological Warfare.” At first I believed it was about control of the population, the ability to track us with chips from the injections, but I now believe it’s much more sinister and that they are taking over ones souls. Why else would they be conducting trials on six month old babies for a cold virus? And there are no long term studies on humans. Yet, people continue to line up for them.

Many doctors have bravely spoken about their concerns about this technology. Most have been censored.

We know simple facts about the injections – that they contain an enzyme named Luciferase, hold a patent with the number 060606, alter ones precious, unique DNA created by God, and insert code with the patent holder’s names attached as well as three unknown phrases. If you want to learn more about that, this is a great interview with Dr. Carrie Madej.

I’ve also read several accounts that people can no longer feel their soul or connection to God after taking the injections. In this instance, a recipient of the Astra Zeneca vaccine from the trial stated that he could not longer feel God. They considered that a neurological problem.

The release comes after a second vaccine test volunteer “Developed neurological problems.” According to sources who claim to be familiar with the vaccine trials, the second volunteer suddenly started saying “They’ve killed God; I can’t feel God anymore – my Soul is dead” after the vaccine.

Here is a link to a discussion about how people are different following the injections.

Here is the six hour documentary by Revelations of Jesus Christ Ministries. It ties everything together. It’s well worth the time to watch it and try to be open minded about what’s really happening.

https://rumble.com/vgcdi3-its-worse-than-you-think-full-documentary.html

They Could Have Done This With Any Cold

Bretigne Shaffer interview with Kevin McKernan

Kevin McKernan developed the SOLiD sequencer and worked on the Human Genome Project at MIT/WIBR

Important discussion of cycle threshold limits of SarsCov2 PCR tests. Running a test past the recommended cycle number produces a high number of false positive results. Cycle threshold should not be over 30, yet most test labs in the US and around the world set it to 37-40 and even as high as 45. At that point, the RNA is amplified so much that even an inactive, old viral fragment can yield a positive result—causing many people to quarantine unnecessarily.

In any given year, we could have done similar mass testing for any common cold and ended up with similar results. There is no need to lock everyone in their homes. This is destroying our society.

The best option is to stop mass testing. Do not submit to a test unless you are showing symptoms and your doctor recommends a test. Understand the ramifications of a positive test. You will need to quarantine and submit names of all close contacts who will also be forced to quarantine. It is unnecessary. Treat any illness — as we always have. If you become worse, seek medical attention. Most likely it will be no different than any past cold or flu.

Kevin McKernan twitter: https://twitter.com/Kevin_McKernan
Bretigne Shaffer website: https://bretigne.typepad.com/on_the_banks/

Covid-19 Masks Are A Crime Against Humanity And Child Abuse

Reblogging this from Vanessa Beeley’s blog.

The following is a transcript of the highlights (by Henna Maria) from Dr. Margarite Griesz-Brisson’s recent extremely pressing video message, that was translated on-air from German into English by Claudia Stauber. Video at the end of the transcript.

Dr. Margarite Griesz-Brisson MD, PhD is a Consultant Neurologist and Neurophysiologist with a PhD in Pharmacology, with special interest in neurotoxicology, environmental medicine, neuroregeneration and neuroplasticity. This is what she has to say about masks and their effects on our brains:

“The rebreathing of our exhaled air will without a doubt create oxygen deficiency and a flooding of carbon dioxide. We know that the human brain is very sensitive to oxygen deprivation. There are nerve cells for example in the hippocampus, that can’t be longer than 3 minutes without oxygen – they cannot survive. The acute warning symptoms are headaches, drowsiness, dizziness, issues in concentration, slowing down of the reaction time – reactions of the cognitive system. 

However, when you have chronic oxygen deprivation, all of those symptoms disappear, because you get used to it. But your efficiency will remain impaired and the undersupply of oxygen in your brain continues to progress.

We know that neuro-degenerative diseases take years to decades to develop. If today you forget your phone number, the breakdown in your brain would have already started 20 or 30 years ago.

While you’re thinking, that you have gotten used to wearing your mask and rebreathing your own exhaled air, the degenerative processes in your brain are getting amplified as your oxygen deprivation continues.

The second problem is that the nerve cells in your brain are unable to divide themselves normally. So in case our governments will generously allow as to get rid of the masks and go back to breathing oxygen freely again in a few months, the lost nerve cells will no longer be regenerated. What is gone is gone.

[..]I do not wear a mask, I need my brain to think. I want to have a clear head when I deal with my patients, and not be in a carbon dioxide induced anaesthesia. 

[..]There is no unfounded medical exemption from face masks because oxygen deprivation is dangerous for every single brain. It must be the free decision of every human being whether they want to wear a mask that is absolutely ineffective to protect themselves from a virus. 

For children and adolescents, masks are an absolute no-no. Children and adolescents have an extremely active and adaptive immune system and they need a constant interaction with the microbiome of the Earth. Their brain is also incredibly active, as it is has so much to learn. The child’s brain, or the youth’s brain is thirsting for oxygen. The more metabolically active the organ is, the more oxygen it requires.  In children and adolescents every organ is metabolically active.

To deprive a child’s or an adolescent’s brain from oxygen, or to restrict it in any way, is not only dangerous to their health, it is absolutely criminal. Oxygen deficiency inhibits the development of the brain, and the damage that has taken place as a result CANNOT be reversed. 

The child needs the brain to learn, and the brain needs oxygen to function.  We don’t need a clinical study for that. This is simple, indisputable physiology. Conscious and purposely induced oxygen deficiency is an absolutely deliberate health hazard, and an absolute medical contraindication. 

An absolute medical contraindication in medicine means that this drug, this therapy, this method or measure should not be used – is not allowed to be used. To coerce an entire population to use an absolute medical contraindication by force, there must be definite and serious reasons for this, and the reasons must be presented to competent interdisciplinary and independent bodies to be verified and authorized. 

When in ten years, dementia is going to increase exponentially, and the younger generations couldn’t reach their god-given potential, it won’t help to say “we didn’t need the masks”.

[..]How can a veterinarian, a software distributor, a business man, an electrical car manufacturer and a physicist decided on matters regarding the health of the entire population? Please dear colleagues, we all have to wake up.

I know how damaging oxygen deprivation is for the brain, cardiologist knows it for the heart, the pulmonologist knows it for the lungs. Oxygen deprivation damages every single organ. 

Where are our health departments, our health insurance, our medical associations? It would have been their duty to be vehemently against the lockdown and to stop it and stop it from the very beginning. 

Why do the medical boards give punishments to doctors who give people exemptions? Does the person or the doctor seriously have to prove that oxygen deprivation harms people? What kind of medicine are our doctors and medical associations representing?

Who is responsible for this crime? The ones who want to enforce it? The ones who let it happen and play along, or the ones who don’t prevent it?[..]It’s not about masks, it’s not about viruses, it’s certainly not about your health. It is about much much more. I am not participating. I am not afraid. 
[..]You can notice, they are already taking our air to breathe.

The imperative of the hour is personal responsibility.

We are responsible for what we think, not the media. We are responsible for what we do, not our superiors. We are responsible for our health, not the World Health Organization. And we are responsible for what happens in our country, not the government.”

Executive Orders Are Not Laws

Businesses need to understand that the constitution is not suspended during a health emergency. This opinion article in the Washington Times explains it perfectly.

If government holds the authority to declare national emergencies, and then government holds the authority to order citizens at will, using these declared national emergencies as justification for the orders, think where that leaves the Constitution.

In a dust pile of tyranny.

In times of national crises, it’s incumbent on the citizens to ensure their civil rights are upheld. Because simply put: Government is not going to do it. Remember: Executive orders are not laws.

Many businesses are following the unlawful executive orders out of fear of losing their business licenses. Please understand that all of the mandates are unconstitutional. A federal judge in Pennsylvania correctly ruled that closures and mandates are unconstitutional. We need to fight this tyranny and inform as many people as possible that the government is being unlawful by placing constraints on businesses. You do not have to reduce capacity, space your tables apart, install plexiglass or place stickers and arrows on your floor. You do not have to require your employees or customers to wear masks. These are guidelines, not laws.

I recently discovered that NCDHHS has used unlawful language in their guideline bulletins by stating that the rules were required. This is not true. I sent this letter to their complaint division. I hope others will do the same. We need to fight the tyranny. Our constitution protects us.

NCDHHS

Complaint Intake Unit
2711 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-2711

I am filing a complaint regarding the wording on your Covid business guidelines. Your documents state that the listed guidelines for social distancing, masks, table spacing and more are required. Your agency has no authority to require businesses to do anything that conflicts with the United States and North Carolina constitutions. As stated by federal Judge William Stickman in his recent ruling in Pennsylvania:

“The governor’s efforts to slow the spread of the coronavirus “were undertaken with the good intention of addressing a public health emergency,” Stickman wrote. “But even in an emergency, the authority of government is not unfettered.”

It is reasonable for your agency to offer CDC guidelines to businesses, but it is unacceptable to place these unlawful constraints on businesses regarding occupancy levels, spacing, cleaning methods and face coverings. Period. This is not subject to any judicial ruling. I am demanding that you follow the law.

The remedy is to immediately update all documents on your website to specify that these are guidelines, not requirements and to discuss the change at the earliest press conference so businesses can be informed.

I have included an example of the “requirements” outlined in the guidance letter for businesses. This must be corrected immediately so that businesses are not duped into believing you have the authority to dictate how their business must be run. You are breaking the law.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Signed.

 

The Unreliable Co#$% Test

A recent New York Times article described how at least 90% of Covid-19 tests are producing false positive results because the tests exceed the recommended threshold value (or number of cycles). Most labs are running the test to 40+ cycles which is not recommended because the results are invalid at that high a level of amplification. They basically begin detecting any protein or RNA and will show as a positive that can’t be trusted.

The North Carolina State Lab of Public Health uses two methods – The CDC 2019 nCov Real Time PCR test and the TaqPath Covid-19 Combo Kit.

The CDC kit was released shortly after the supposed US outbreaks of Covid-19 were confirmed. Many state labs are likely using this kit. The Ct threshold is 40, thus 90% of the tests are likely false positive.

Researcher, David Crowe described the significance of PCR cycle thresholds:

The PCR algorithm is cyclical. At each cycle it generates approximately double the amount of DNA (which, in RT-PCR, corresponding to the RNA that the process started with). When used as a test you don’t know the amount of starting material, but the amount of DNA at the end of each cycle will be shown indirectly by fluorescent molecules that are attached to the probes. The amount of light produced after every step will then approximately double, and when it reaches a certain intensity the process is halted and the sample is declared positive (implying infected). If, after a certain number of cycles, there is still not sufficient DNA, then the sample is declared negative (implying not infected). This cycle number (Ct) used to separate positive from negative is arbitrary, and is not the same for every organization doing testing. For example, there is a paper published that reported using 36 as the cutoff for positive, 37-39 as indeterminate, requiring more testing, and above 39 as negative. Another paper used 37 as the cutoff, with no intermediate zone. In a list of test kits approved by the US FDA one manufacturer each recommended 30 cycles, 31, 35, 36, 37, 38 and 39. 40 cycles was most popular, chosen by 12 manufacturers, and one each recommended 43 and 45.

Implicit in using a Ct number is the assumption that approximately the same amount of original RNA (within a multiple of two) will produce the same Ct number. However, there are many possibilities for error in RT-PCR. There are inefficiencies in extracting the RNA, even larger inefficiencies in converting the RNA to complementary DNA (Bustin noted that efficiency is rarely over 50% and can easily vary by a factor of 10), and inefficiencies in the PCR process itself. Bustin, in the podcast, described reliance on an arbitrary Ct number as “absolute nonsense, it makes no sense whatsoever”. It certainly cannot be assumed that the same Ct number on tests done at different laboratories indicates the same original quantity of RNA.

Professor Bustin stated that cycling more than 35 times was unwise, but it appears that nobody is limiting cycles to 35 or less. Cycling too much could result in false positives as background fluorescence builds up in the PCR reaction.

Clearly, the lack of uniformity in tests and the high cycle thresholds makes testing extremely unreliable, so the number of fatalities from Covid-19 can’t be trusted, and the running tally of cases does not have any correlation to viral spread whatsoever.

It’s likely this is occurring everywhere in the world as PCR is the only mode of testing being used. None of the tests are FDA approved. They have temporary approval based on Emergency Use Authorization. The FDA continues to add additional test kits and reagents every day despite the fact that we are not in a state of emergency. It’s time for the FDA to set reliable standards on these tests.

Also, consider the serious consequences of treating people who may have received a false positive for Covid-19 disease. This is dangerous. And consider that we are unnecessarily quarantining people with false positives, then contact tracing and it is all based on a meaningless test.

The CDC recently stated that asymptomatic people no longer need to be tested, likely due to the exceeded cycle threshold. If asymptomatics are not a threat, no one needs to wear a mask. This all needs to stop now.

%d bloggers like this: