The following are highlights from an interview of biotech analyst Karen Kingston by Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog.com.
In January 2020 Alex Azar, Secretary of HHS declared that the United States was in a public health emergency and national security was threatened — at a time when we did not even have a test for Covid-19. So, the “emergency” was based on a lie . . . and it continues. Remove the emergency, and all mandates go away, all tests, all EUA vaccines and treatments, but it continues to be renewed.
The most recent CDC Morbidity and Mortality report comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated showed no correlation between hospitalizations and positive Covid tests. Hospitals record all “Covid-like disease” as Covid hospitalizations as there are financial incentives to do so. Yet a random study showed that only five percent of 6300 people hospitalized for Covid disease tested positive. This means that there is no correlation of the virus to illness. The illnesses are from something else – be it the flu, bacterial or viral pneumonia OR vaccine induced illness.
The FDA recently approved the EUA vaccines for children ages 5-11 despite the CDC reports of childhood infections again showing no correlation between hospitalizations and positive tests for the virus.
The FDA was and is aware of all of the potential harmful effects of the Covid vaccines.
More fraud
A whistleblower reported to the FDA that a Pfizer vaccine trial with 1,000 participants had a lot of issues. Patients weren’t properly monitored, the study wasn’t blind as it was supposed to be because medical staff was aware of who was vaccinated and most importantly, data showing over 100 participants exhibiting serious side effects was not logged. The whistleblower was fired the next day.
The Pfizer phase 3 table showed 9 vaccinated people became infected with in seven days and 169 from the placebo group became infected. However, a notation indicates that 409 vaccinated became infected and they were omitted from the results because they considered it “side effects”of the vaccine and not illness caused by the vaccine! This is outrageous fraud and everyone continues to rely on this fraudulent reporting.
I urge you to watch the entire video. The state of emergency is based on lies and the data to support efficacy of the vaccines is manipulated. The vaccinated are suffering ill effects and death as their bodies are instructed to produce toxic proteins that damage the immune system and the public is receiving falsified information to justify the poisonous injections.
OSHA issued their new standard for employers today. The intent is to comply with the federal mandate. I read through it and will share pertinent sections. It’s clear that OSHA is not requiring employers to mandate vaccines. They “strongly encourage” them to do so citing grave dangers to the unvaccinated in workplace settings, but employers are not bound by this and have the right to opt out. So, employers like Cisco, IBM, and General Electric have implemented a vaccine mandate for all employees – office, plant, and remote under the guise that they have no choice but to comply.
Many employers cite the guidance for working as a federal contractor, but it is guidance, not law. This is not enforceable. The ridiculous “guidance” in the document suggests that even remote workers must be vaccinated. That offers no health benefit – perceived or otherwise to any staff with the federal agency or contractor. This excerpt details the guidance for remote contract workers.
But these corporations take it one step further and mandate ALL employees to be vaccinated or face dismissal even if they are remote and don’t work on federal contracts! This is outrageous!
OSHA
Moving on to the OSHA emergency standard, this is their statement:
“OSHA has determined that the best method for addressing the grave danger that Covid-19 poses to unvaccinated workers is to strongly encourage the use of the single most effective and efficient protection available: Vaccination. Although OSHA may well have the authority to impose a vaccination mandate, OSHA has decided against pursuing strict vaccination requirement and has instead crated the ETS to strongly encourage vaccination.
. . . Accordingly, to further the goal of increasing workforce vaccination rates, this ETS requires employers to implement a mandatory vaccination policy unless they adopt a policy in which employees may either be fully vaccinated OR regularly tested for Covid-19 and wear a face covering in most situations when they work near other individuals.
So, it’s clear that there is no vaccine mandate from OSHA. Further, employees have the right to file an exemption from the tests.
6.H. If an employee is entitled to a reasonable accommodation due to a disability or sincerely held religious belief that prevents them from being vaccinated, would the employee still need to be tested weekly?
Yes. The ETS requires weekly Covid-19 testing of all un-vaccinated employees, including those entitled to a reasonable accommodation from vaccination requirements. However, if testing for Covid-19 conflicts with a worker’s sincerely held religious belief, practice or observance, the worker may be entitled to a reasonable. accommodation.
It’s also clear that employers can set up a hybrid approach of requiring testing and masks for office employees and no requirements for remote workers. Instead, many large companies are mandating vaccinations for all employees and it’s inexcusable.
3. B. Am I permitted to implement a partial mandatory vaccination policy that requires vaccination for employees that provide services directly to members of the public, but allows other employees the choice of vaccination or testing?
Yes. OSHA recognizes there may be employers who develop and implement partial mandatory vaccination policies, ie. that apply to only a portion of their workforce. An example might be a retail corporation who has a mixture of staff working at the corporate headquarters, performing intermittent telework from home, and working in stores serving customers. In this type of situation, the employer may choose to require vaccination of only some subset of its employees, and treat vaccination as optional for others (e.g., those who work from headquarters or who perform intermittent work).
The lawsuits that have been filed over the federal mandate will likely go nowhere because mandates are not laws. It is the employers who are choosing to implement stricter requirements than the guidelines and standards from OSHA and the Safe Federal Workforce Task Force suggest.
I hope you find this information helpful. I suggest you question your corporate leader and human resource departments about their rationale for implementing such extreme measures, especially on remote workers who are not in contact with any other employees or federal workers. They are acting as if these are new laws which must be obeyed. Only our legislators can enact laws. This is a dangerous, deceptive tactic similar to the mask mandates when all of this started. It is destroying our freedoms.
One final important observation from reading the OSHA document is that they are making the claim that the FDA approved the Pfizer vaccine. That is not true. The Comirnaty-labeled vaccines are not available in the United States; therefore all vaccines remain under emergency use authorization and can’t legally be mandated.
Although the FDA “approved” a product labeled Comirnaty, there is no supply of this product in the United States. So, that means that all Covid-19 vaccines available in the United States are under emergency use authorization, and the executive order stating that Phizer had an approved treatment is false.
Senator Ron Johnson inquired about this and it’s critical because experimental treatments can not be mandated. EUA products are experimental and must be voluntary with informed consent.
The senator wrote to Pfizer and BioNTech, “When the FDA made its August announcement it stated ‘[a]lthough COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is approved to prevent COVID-19 in individuals 16 years of age and older, there is not sufficient approved vaccine available for distribution to this population in its entirety at the time of reissuance of this EUA.’
On September 13, 2021, the National Library of Medicine within the National Institutes of Health, reported, ‘[a]t present, Pfizer does not plan to produce any product with these new [Comirnaty National Drug Codes] and labels over the next few months while EUA authorized product is still available and being made available for U.S. distribution.’
On September 22, 2021, the FDA reissued the EUA for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, with the same language regarding availability limitations for individuals 16 years of age and older. Based on these statements it appears that individuals who are required to be vaccinated under President Biden’s and the Department of Defense’s vaccine mandates may not be able to receive the fully licensed and approved vaccine.”
It is illegal to mandate an experimental drug. Children’s Health Defense outlines the applicable law.
NOTICE FOR EMPLOYERS, UNIVERSITIES AND OTHER INSTITUTIONS MANDATING COVID-19 VACCINES August 31, 2021
This serves as notice that the requirement for any individual to be vaccinated against COVID-19 for employment or participation at a university or other institution violates federal law. The COVID-19 vaccines manufactured by Moderna and J&J are merely authorized, not approved or licensed, by the federal government; they are Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) only. They merely “may be effective.”
Federal law 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) requires that the person to whom an EUA vaccine is administered be advised, “of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.” The reason for the right of refusal stems from the fact that EUA products are by definition experimental.
Even if the FDA approves and licenses existing COVID vaccines, they will remain experimental and thus subject to the international requirement that informed consent is “absolutely essential.”
Nuremberg Code, Article 1; Abdullahi v Pfizer, Inc., 562 F3d 163 [2d Cir 2009]. Phase III clinical trials for the Pfizer vaccine do not end until May 2, 2023; and for the Moderna vaccine until October 27, 2022. EUA products are by definition experimental and thus require the right to refuse. Under the Nuremberg Code, the foundation of ethical medicine, no one may be coerced to participate in a medical experiment. Consent of the individual is “absolutely essential.” A federal court held that the U.S. military could not mandate EUA vaccines to soldiers. Doe #1 v. Rumsfeld, 297 F.Supp.2d 119 (2003). The court held: “…the United States cannot demand that members of the armed forces also serve as guinea pigs for experimental drugs.” Id. at 135. No court has ever upheld a mandate for an EUA vaccine.
The liability for forced participation in a medical experiment, including injury or death, may be incalculable. Medical and religious exemptions will be insufficient to overcome the illegality of EUA vaccine mandates. Children’s Health Defense urges U.S. employers, universities and other institutions to respect and uphold the rights of individuals to refuse EUA COVID-19 vaccines.
This information must be shared with employers and universities attempting to coerce staff and students into taking this as a condition or enrollment or employment. It must be voluntary because it is experimental. Period. It doesn’t matter what the executive orders state. A president can not create laws.
This is an amazing idea. Employers can post jobs, people can post their resumes, applicants can search for jobs.
“We believe that no right is more sacred than the right of every individual to the control of their own person, free from all restraint or interference of others. This job board is for open positions from a variety of companies and locations who align with our values.”
As my religious exemption is a federal requirement for employers according to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, I respectfully request a reasonable accommodation to maintain my employment with _______________________.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 prohibits employers from discrimination for religious beliefs.
SEC. 2000e-2. [Section 703]
(a) Employer practices
It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer –
(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or
(2) to limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
I’m opposed to all genetic therapeutic injections including those designed for Sars-Cov2. It is against my religion to accept an injection that attempts to alter my God-given code of life via synthetically designed genetic code which enters all cells of the body. Moderna describes mRNA therapies as the “software of life.”
It also “tricks” our God-given immune systems by substituting a nucleoside with one that does not occur naturally in our genetic sequence.
They accomplish this by substituting one of the four nucleosides that make up our genes which are A,C, G, and U. They replace U with Ψ.
Important toll-like receptor cells are suppressed by this substitution. They normally catch things that don’t belong in our bodies. They stop viruses, bacteria, cancers and other pathogens from harming us. Suppressing our innate immune system to allow synthetic RNA from these injections is putting us at risk for other diseases. I reject the tricking of my God-given immune system.
It is also against my religion to use any substance in which fetal cells are utilized in the research, manufacturing and testing process. All of the EUA injections utilize fetal cells.
I was created in God’s image and I refuse to jeopardize my salvation by defiling my body which is the temple of God.
16 Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?
17 If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are. (1 Corinthian 3:16-17)
I respectfully request that you accommodate my exemption as required by law. I agree to . . .
(Request your accommodation here – such as agreeing to work remote, wear a mask, distance until the pandemic is over).
If you are unable to locate your state statute, or if you’re in a state that does not have a vaccine exemption statute, please reference Title 7 of the Civil Rights Act for employment exemption.
A new document was published on the National Institute of Health website that describes the danger and ethical concerns that informed consent for ADE are not being shared with people receiving the Covid vaccines. ADE is antibody-dependent enhancement.
ADE is possible with the vaccines and it is serious enough to justify a separate clearly defined warning for all those receiving the vaccines. Quite simply, it could increase the severity of the disease by rendering the antibodies useless against the virus.
Dr. Bhakdi describes how ADE will affect the immune response of the vaccinated.
Results of the study
COVID‐19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitize vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID‐19 disease via antibody‐dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID‐19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.
The prior evidence that vaccine‐elicited, antibody‐dependent enhancement (ADE) of disease is likely to occur to some degree with COVID‐19 vaccines is vertically consistent from controlled SARS studies in primates to clinical observations in SARS and COVID‐19. Thus, a finite, non‐theoretical risk is evident in the medical literature that vaccine candidates composed of the SARS‐CoV‐2 viral spike and eliciting anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 antibodies, be they neutralising or not, place vaccines at higher risk for more severe COVID‐19 disease when they encounter circulating viruses.
The author highlights the point that this risk must be clearly presented to the recipient to fulfill the proper intent of informed consent.
The Satanic influence in plain sight must be exposed if people are to understand the sinister nature of the agenda that’s currently playing out. The leaders allowing this manufactured medical emergency to continue are not looking out us. They are loyal to Satan and this is a spiritual war. Cow worship from ancient times seems relevant to what’s happening today, and in fact it is still very much alive.
Origin of Vaccines
In 1796 Edward Jenner observing that milkmaids seemed to acquire cowpox but not smallpox disease theorized that cowpox provides immunity. He decided to test his theory by injecting pus from the milkmaid’s scabs into an eight year old boy to attempt to immunize him from smallpox disease. Immunity was confirmed based on a scratch test whereby the actual pathogen is smeared into person’s skin. If they don’t acquire the disease it is assumed they had immunity. Jenner’s experiment was considered a success.
Edward Jenner
Jenner named this inoculation procedure vaccination. Vacca means cow. He was given many honors and tributes and was a high level freemason. He became known as the father of immunology.
A hide from a cow named Blossom is in a museum as a tribute to the animal alleged to have provided this medical breakthrough.
Blossom. Dr. Jenner’s House
A huge vaccination campaign began, but studies now show that smallpox outbreaks were less severe in unvaccinated areas. It is similar to what we’re seeing now with the Covid “vaccines”.
“The interesting thing, however, is that the incidence of smallpox actually increased once vaccination programs were instituted. In Jenner’s time, there were only a few hundred cases of smallpox in England. After more than fifteen years of mandatory vaccinations, in 1870 and 1871 alone more than 23,000 people died from the disease. Later, in Japan, nearly 29,000 people died in just seven years under a stringent compulsory vaccination and revaccination program.
This increase in smallpox deaths was associated with a noticeable lack of protection not the best combination of events. For example, in Germany, over 124,000 people died of smallpox during the same epidemic. All had been vaccinated. Additionally, (unaltered) hospital records consistently show that about 90 percent of all smallpox cases occurred after the individual was vaccinated.
This lack of efficacy and increase in disease incidence, while other communicable diseases were declining, led to the refusal of smallpox vaccination by some countries. This resulted in a drop of the incidence of the disease that is quite remarkable. In Australia, when two children died from their smallpox shots, the government terminated compulsory vaccinations. As a result, smallpox virtually disappeared in that country (three cases in fifteen years). When England began to reject vaccination, then the incidence of smallpox deaths decreased accordingly. ” link
But facts don’t matter much. The vaccine program was cemented and propaganda has convinced most even to this day that they are necessary for survival. Is it possible the cow was chosen specifically by the evildoers who have embraced cow worship for centuries? And that it would be linked to the mark of the beast? Let’s explore the history and biblical references to cow worship.
Cow Worship
Europa, Goddess riding a beast
Europe with root word Europa is represented by a woman riding a beast/cow. This worship took place as far back as eight centuries B.C. According to Greek mythology, Zeus seduced Europa by transforming into a cow and tricking Europa into riding on his back. Only later did he reveal his true identity.
“So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.” (Revelation 17:3)
Is it possible the woman on a beast in Revelation is a reference to Europa and that the antichrist will rise up from Europe?
Moloch was an ancient god worshiped by the Israelis from the old testament. They practiced child sacrifice to the god.
Moloch
Leviticus references God’s harsh warnings against such evil worship.
“Again, thou shalt say to the children of Israel, Whosoever he be of the children of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn in Israel, that giveth any of his seed unto Molech; he shall surely be put to death: the people of the land shall stone him with stones.”(20:2)
“And I will set my face against that man, and will cut him off from among his people; because he hath given of his seed unto Molech, to defile my sanctuary, and to profane my holy name.” (20:3)
After Moses led the people of Israel out of Egypt he went to the mountain to fast and meditate but the people grew restless and Aaron asked them to gather all their gold earrings and jewelry and created a false god of a golden calf with fire for the people to worship.
God told Moses to return and stop the idolatry. He destroyed the calf with fire and it was ground up and added to the drinking water which may have been part of the plague they would receive as punishment.
“And the LORD plagued the people, because they made the calf, which Aaron made.” (Exodus 32:35)
So, it’s clear there are several examples of cow worship in biblical history. These false religions were Satanic. Is it possible that the scriptures of the woman riding the beast and God’s response to false cow worship are biblical warnings about the mark? Maybe God intended to warn people about the mark of the beast abomination so there would be no doubt.
The Covid vaccine just happens to be cow connected “vacca” and the strong push to basically bow to the vaccine — worship the beast. Is there a parallel? And the people were plagued for worshiping the golden calf. Are people plagued for taking the vaccine?
Modern day worship is all around us. This is an image from 1991 Time Magazine.
Magazine covers, statues and coins.
The European Union complex resembles the Tower of Babel and the statue in front is a woman riding a cow. And these are the people deciding we should have a New World Order.
More
Other religions also worship the woman and beast/cow.
China 2021 is the year of the cow.
Freemasonry cow worship
Freemasonry cow worship
They even mock us with the term herd immunity.
Consider what’s happening today. How many of us have been shocked at what appears to be vaccine worship, when even people harmed by it continue their worship and allegiance. Every social media discussion begins with a disclosure statement that they are not anti-vax. Satanic inversion has science replacing religion, with the Covid vaccine hailed as the savior.
What if pestilence referenced in Revelation is Satan’s weapon against man from this manufactured medical crisis? The proclaimed “miracle” is actually a bioweapon and mark of the beast? If true, many have been deceived including Christians.
Is the vaccine a false messiah promised to save, but instead is killing and harming people and does not prevent disease as claimed? Billions believed the deception — just like Eve believing Satan’s lie that she would become like God if she ate the apple.
It’s easy to be distrustful of the vaccine when all the nefarious facts are
Proposed quantum dot snakebite vaccine
considered. An experimental injection that goes into the cell and instructs the body to produce a protein with no assurance there won’t be permanent changes to the DNA. The immune system is suppressed to allow the mRNA to enter the cell, thus tricking the body. Luciferase enzyme was used in vaccine development though it’s unclear if it’s in the current vaccines. But they chose that name? Microsoft’s patent tied to movements for social credit has the number 060606. There is no proof of a novel virus that causes disease as it has never been isolated. The synthetic genetic code was selected and pieced together as a guess to what caused one person to become ill. And that became the platform for the testing and vaccine production.
Gateway computers use cow symbolism and Moderna claims their vaccines are an operating system, hacking the software of life. How sinister is that?! I will prefer to keep my God given software of life. The body is God’s temple and the injections are defiling the body, possibly creating an abomination in God’s eyes.
All credit for this blog post goes to Revelations of Jesus Christ Ministries who covered this topic in depth in this video. It’s 2 1/2 hours long so I decided to do a condensed summary to share the important revelations and shared many of the images from that video. Please take the time to watch if you can.
In conclusion, we have a biblical and ongoing history of cow worship and the modern day worship of a vaccine that does the opposite of its claims, as science replaces faith in God. I hope that people will begin to see the evil that’s upon us and turn to God.
Many are needing vaccine exemption forms as schools and businesses attempt to coerce people into getting shots to attend. Here is a religious exemption example for North Carolina. You can tailor it to any state by looking up your state statutes for religious exemptions and typing it into the form.
Update: Here’s another version that you may wish to modify or use “as is.”
RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL STATUTE 130A-157
If the bona fide religious beliefs of an adult or the parent, guardian, or person in loco parentis of a child are contrary to the immunization requirements contained in this Part [Chapter 130A, Article 6, Part B], the adult or the child shall be exempt from the requirements.
Upon submission of a written statement of the bona fide religious beliefs and opposition to the immunization requirements, the person may attend the college, university, school or facility without presenting a certificate of immunization. Pursuant to the aforementioned N.C.G.S. 130A-157.
I, the undersigned, declare the Covid-19 vaccine as set forth in N.C.G.S. 130A-152 contrary to my bona fide religious beliefs as these vaccines contain aborted fetal cell lines and differ from standard vaccines by allowance of the synthetic mRNA or DNA code to enter the cells. This level of intrusion into my body’s cells is unacceptable as the body is God’s temple and defiling it could jeopardize my salvation according to my religious belief. Therefore, as permitted by law I request an exemption from the immunization requirements set forth by (Name of the institution) for admittance and participation as required by the above statute. I agree to stay home if I am ill or have a fever.
“Complicit politicians and most media outlets have gone along with an engineered fabrication involving an invisible pathogen that has never been shown to exist.”
Jon Rappoport just published a great article that ties in nicely with this video.
Stop Wrongful Convictions 