Is Co#@$ Disease Real?

Many of us have been poring through data to understand the justifications for continued lockdowns. Governors and Health Directors in many states have used sketchy metrics to determine when businesses can open, why masks must be worn, distancing, and many other arbitrary draconian measures all in the name of health. They claim they are protecting us from a deadly virus known as SARS-COV-2, but a recent article titled Covid 19 Tests are Scientifically Meaningless by German journalist, Torsten Engelbrecht calls the entire pandemic into question.

The article is very well written, documented, and sourced, and I’ve shared it as much as possible but it desperately needs to go viral. I believe it’s not receiving the attention it deserves due it’s technical nature, so I am simplifying it in the hopes that more people can grasp the significance of what appears to be fraud and deception.

PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) tests are used to diagnose Covid-19, but they were not designed for that purpose. The World Health Organization (WHO) accepted it for this purpose but never validated it. The function of PCR tests is to replicate DNA or RNA billions of times so a specimen can be an adequate size for scientific examination. It is not supposed to be a disease diagnostic tool.

In fact, in 2007 medical experts believed Whooping Cough was going around and it was initially confirmed via a PCR test. This impacted thousands of people and hospitals as treatments, isolation and vaccinations were administered. It was finally sent to the CDC for verification of the disease and it turned out that it was a false epidemic. I believe Covid-19 is also a false epidemic.

In determining the optimum method to diagnose a specific virus or pathogen, one must first have a gold standard that verifies the very existence of the virus. Distinctive symptoms may be used as that standard, but SARS-COV-2 doesn’t have distinctive, specific symptoms to the exclusion of other illnesses, so that’s out. The standard protocol to verify the existence of a new virus is to isolate and purify it from an ill patient and then examine it with an electron microscope. Once purified, it can be used to verify that others with a similar illness do in fact have the same disease. That can lead to monitoring of the spread.

Once the pathogen is isolated and purified, the gene sequences can be used to calibrate a PCR test kit which ensures that the kit is detecting the exact same virus from which the kit was calibrated. The problem is, no one has ever properly isolated and purified the alleged SARS-COV-2 virus. That is troublesome because it means we don’t know what was used to calibrate the PCR test kits, but it doesn’t appear to have been SARS-COV-2.

The reason for this is that PCR is extremely sensitive, which means it can detect even the smallest pieces of DNA or RNA — but it cannot determine where these particles came from. That has to be determined beforehand.

And because the PCR tests are calibrated for gene sequences (in this case RNA sequences because SARS-CoV-2 is believed to be a RNA virus), we have to know that these gene snippets are part of the looked-for virus. And to know that, correct isolation and purification of the presumed virus has to be executed.

As it stands, we have no proof that the RNA detected in all of the millions of Covid-19 tests matches anything of viral origin! Engelbrecht went to great lengths to question all of the researchers and has yet to find anyone who purified the collected cellular debris.

Study 1: Leo L. M. Poon; Malik Peiris. “Emergence of a novel human coronavirus threatening human health” Nature Medicine, March 2020
Replying Author: Malik Peiris
Date: May 12, 2020
Answer:“The image is the virus budding from an infected cell. It is not purified virus.”

Study 2: Myung-Guk Han et al. “Identification of Coronavirus Isolated from a Patient in Korea with COVID-19”, Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives, February 2020
Replying Author: Myung-Guk Han
Date: May 6, 2020
Answer:“We could not estimate the degree of purification because we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells.”

Study 3: Wan Beom Park et al. “Virus Isolation from the First Patient with SARS-CoV-2 in Korea”, Journal of Korean Medical Science, February 24, 2020
Replying Author: Wan Beom Park
Date: March 19, 2020
Answer: “We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification.”

Study 4: Na Zhu et al., “A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China”, 2019, New England Journal of Medicine, February 20, 2020
Replying Author: Wenjie Tan
Date: March 18, 2020
Answer:“[We show] an image of sedimented virus particles, not purified ones.”

This begs the question —What was used to create the PCR tests if the virus was never properly isolated? And it totally discredits the results of all Covid-19 tests.

The Koch postulate qualifies a pathogen as causing a disease, ie. SARS-COV-2 allegedly causes Covid-19 disease.

However, the postulate has not been met for this so called virus. So we’ve trashed the global economy for something that does not even meet the criteria of a disease-causing pathogen. I believe it’s possible that the PCR tests being used are picking up RNA from many various infections that go around every year and there’s been a trend for the past several years of serious pneumonia outbreaks in nursing homes, so it’s not surprising that we could get positive RNA tests correlated to deaths but with no direct evidence that the cause of death is from SARS-COV-2.

It also means people are being treated improperly for a virus that may not even exist. Perhaps a large percentage of us would test positive with these RNA tests every year. Anecdotally, many have reported that they don’t know anyone suffering from illnesses, and aside from the media and government official’s hysterics over cases numbers, there’s no evidence of a highly contagious illness in our environment.

There have also been reports of false positive Covid-19 tests that are later determined to be negative and sometimes positive again! Testing! Testing! Testing! That’s what all the health experts advised and consider that they may be simply measuring every random viral illness, colds, and pneumonia that happen to contain RNA, lumped them all together and renamed it Covid-19. That would explain why it’s no more severe than the flu and why incidences are on par with past flu numbers, although slightly higher but that would be due to all of the additional random testing.

Does this explain why health directors never share their data? Is this also why it’s been confirmed that many deaths were labeled as Covid-19 despite no confirmatory tests? There is also the fact that in many areas such as Italy, autopsies confirmed that the cause of death was from other factors —not from Covid-19.

Consider that billions of dollars of vaccines and other medications may be in development for a fake disease and will be administered to as many people as possible. I honestly don’t believe that labs have the ability to create a virus and spread it through a population. And I don’t believe the bat story either.

Another consideration is that Event 201 took place approximately one month before the alleged SARS-COV-2 outbreak. Event 201 was a simulated exercise of a Coronavirus pandemic. What are the odds of that timing? I think many of us instinctively know that things don’t add up and that this so called virus is being used to push through a global agenda, but proving it has been difficult. Maybe Engelbrecht found the proof and we need to demand answers. Where is the proof of the isolated SARS-COV-2 that causes Covid-19 and proof that it meets the Koch postulate?

Please take the time to thoroughly read the entire article linked above which goes into more detail about error rates that we may be experiencing. This is potentially the largest psychological operation ever perpetrated in history. We are being threatened daily over face masks and loss of freedom. Many have lost their jobs. Many have died alone. Many have died of suicide and drug overdoses. We deserve to have our freedom and our lives back.

 

 

 

Author: Lynne

I research and write about questionable cases, unfair trials, police misconduct, wrongful convictions and exonerations.

9 thoughts on “Is Co#@$ Disease Real?”

  1. Viral Facts:

    ‣ Viruses do not ‘exist’ outside of petri-dish solutions or a living body.
    ‣ Viruses cannot enter through the skin or eyes. Such vectors do not work because the mucus membranes and the immune system discard small amounts of foreign proteins such as viruses.
    ‣ Viruses cannot enter through wounds because we bleed outwardly, not inwardly.
    ‣ Viruses cannot function without a host cell that manufactures them and encodes them, and viruses cannot replicate without a host cell.
    ‣ Viruses do not ‘infect’ or ‘invade’ cells. They are not alive to do so in the first place.
    ‣ Viruses almost never dissolve living tissue, unless in specific circumstances such as polio and degenerative nervous system diseases where metal toxicity is present.
    ‣ Viruses’ primary function is to dissolve dead matter.
    ‣ Cells produce different viral strains depending on the condition of the tissue involved.
    ‣ There are 320,000 viral strains inherent to the human body, and each cell contains the viral protein makeup to manufacture each strain when the body calls for it.
    ‣ Viruses are sequenced/encoded by blood cells via RNA/DNA to break down specific dead and dying tissue and waste.
    ‣ Viruses are very specific protein structures.
    ‣ Coughing, sneezing is not a vector for the transmission of viruses. Saliva and mucus membranes break down any such particles.
    ‣ Skin is not a vector either because viruses cannot cross dead skin layers.
    ‣ Viruses are a result of internal toxicity caused by the environment.
    ‣ Viruses are not living organisms or living microbes.
    ‣ Viruses do not have a respiratory system, nor do they have a nucleus or digestive system.
    ‣ Viruses are not alive.
    ‣ Viruses are not contagious.

    References:
    1) Béchamp Or Pasteur? A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology by E. Douglas Hume, 1923
    2) The Blood and Its Third Element by Antoine Béchamp, 1912
    3) Immunization: The Reality Behind the Myth, by Walene James, 1942 (discusses Béchamp’s ‘Terrain Theory’ of bacteria and viruses.)
    4) The Dream & Lie of Louis Pasteur, R.B. Pearson, 1942 (First published in 1942 under the title ‘Pasteur Plagiarist Imposter!-the Germ Theory Exploded’.)

  2. ATOMIC BOMBSHELL: No proof for the RNA being of viral origin

    Now the question is: What is required first for virus isolation/proof? We need to know where the RNA for which the PCR tests are calibrated comes from.

    As textbooks (e.g., White/Fenner. Medical Virology, 1986, p. 9) as well as leading virus researchers such as Luc Montagnier or Dominic Dwyer state, particle purification — i.e. the separation of an object from everything else that is not that object, as for instance Nobel laureate Marie Curie purified 100 mg of radium chloride in 1898 by extracting it from tons of pitchblende — is an essential pre-requisite for proving the existence of a virus, and thus to prove that the RNA from the particle in question comes from a new virus.

    The reason for this is that PCR is extremely sensitive, which means it can detect even the smallest pieces of DNA or RNA — but it cannot determine where these particles came from. That has to be determined beforehand.

    Because the PCR tests are calibrated for gene sequences (in this case RNA sequences because SARS-CoV-2 is believed to be a RNA virus), we have to know that these gene snippets are part of the looked-for virus. And to know that, correct isolation and purification of the presumed virus has to be executed.

    Hence, we have asked the science teams of the relevant papers which are referred to in the context of SARS-CoV-2 for proof whether the electron-microscopic shots depicted in their in vitro experiments show purified viruses.

    But not a single team could answer that question with “yes” — and nobody said purification was not a necessary step. We only got answers like “No, we did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification.”

    We asked several study authors “Do your electron micrographs show the purified virus?”, they gave the following responses:

    Study 1: Leo L. M. Poon; Malik Peiris. “Emergence of a novel human coronavirus threatening human health,” Nature Medicine, March 2020

    Replying Author: Malik Peiris

    Date: May 12, 2020

    Answer: “The image is the virus budding from an infected cell. It is not purified virus.”

    Study 2: Myung-Guk Han et al. “Identification of Coronavirus Isolated from a Patient in Korea with COVID-19,” Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives, February 2020

    Replying Author: Myung-Guk Han

    Date: May 6, 2020

    Answer: “We could not estimate the degree of purification because we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells.”

    Study 3: Wan Beom Park et al. “Virus Isolation from the First Patient with SARS-CoV-2 in Korea,” Journal of Korean Medical Science, February 24, 2020

    Replying Author: Wan Beom Park

    Date: March 19, 2020

    Answer: “We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification.”

    Study 4: Na Zhu et al., “A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China,” 2019, New England Journal of Medicine, February 20, 2020

    Replying Author: Wenjie Tan

    Date: March 18, 2020

    Answer: “[We show] an image of sedimented virus particles, not purified ones.”

    Regarding the mentioned papers it is clear that what is shown in the electron micrographs (EMs) is the end result of the experiment, meaning there is no other result that they could have made EMs from.

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/national-security-alert-covid-tests-scientifically-fraudulent-epidemic-false-positives/5720271

Comments

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s