I previously discussed vote switching in the presidential election. This can be identified by closely examining the election night vote counts. There is no evidence of vote switching in the North Carolina presidential election, at least based on election night counts, but I decided to take a look at the governor race since it was surprising that President Trump, Thom Tillis, and Mark Robinson won the key Republican races and Dan Forest lost to Roy Cooper. Dan Forest was a popular candidate. Yard signs were everywhere —including my front yard. Roy Cooper’s entire campaign centered on masks.
I found two incidents of vote switching using the New York Times election night data amounting to a loss of 7,457 votes for Forest. This may not seem like a lot, but it is fraud. North Carolina combined the mail-in and in person early voting ballots so it is impossible to see the machine vote counts for early voting which resulted in approximately 75% of the total votes in this state.
At the beginning of election night count there were two large drops totaling 3,285,522 votes. There were a total of 5,524,693 total votes in this race, so that was a substantial number. The combined total of pre-election votes for the two candidates was 4,406,448, leaving only 1,118, 245 votes which were cast on election day. I’m not sure if these were absentee ballots combined with early voting, but I assume they were.
This gave Cooper a considerable lead right from the start. As the counts progressed, Forest lead most vote count updates steadily. In fact, if the only votes counted were from election day, Forest would have won 61% to 38.5%.
It’s a bit of a disconnect that Forest won so strongly on election day and Cooper won the early vote/mail-in ballot part of the election. Early voting consisted of 37% Democrats, 31.7% Republicans and 30.5% Unaffiliated. The result was 59.3% for Cooper and 40% for Forest — approximately the opposite of election day votes. I would have expected a stronger result for Forest. It doesn’t make a lot of sense since unaffiliated voters tend to vote Republican more often than Democrat.
Now, to explain how to identify fraud/vote switching:
- First, look for a decrease in percentage. Note from count update 35 to update 36 below, Forest’s share decreased .001.
- Next, calculate the share of votes for both candidates. In this example, Cooper had 2,602,979 at count 35 and 2,605,851 at count 36, resulting in a net gain of 2,872 votes.
- Forest had 2,299,961 votes at count 35 and 2,297,525 at count 36 for a net loss of 2,436 votes. Although the percentages can shift, the cumulative vote count should never decrease. That is a red flag.
4,967,519 (.463) = 2,299,961
4,972,999 (.462) = 2,297,525
Note the decrease
Forest lost those votes, completely undetected if not for this media database.

It occurred again:
Forest lost 5,021 votes this time. Cooper gained 472.
Cooper: 2,807,184 to 2,807,656 = + 472
Forest 2,567,347 to 2,562,326 = – 5021

This manipulation has been identified in many states, but people are mostly focused on the presidential results. We need to look at all races. I believe this is enough to warrant a full audit of the governor race and in particular the early voting and mail-in ballots, which simply can’t be trusted. There may be other anomalies from this data, but I’m not able to easily detect it. An expert in vote fraud certainly should review everything.
If you would like to verify the results or look at other races, you can modify the search at the link. So, change this from north-carolina governor to north-carolina president or senate. You can also change the state. Once you get to the link, click on data, then races, then “expand all.” You will need to scroll down quite a bit to see the vote count updates.
https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/north-carolina/governor.json
https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/north-carolina/president.json
This article is also very helpful to figure out what to look for. https://noqreport.com/2020/11/11/data-deep-dive-on-dominion-voting-systems-offers-incontrovertible-proof-of-election-hack/
Update: An expert’s exhibit from the Michigan lawsuit indicates that fraud is evident if the vote count has decimals. It’s common sense that votes should only be in whole numbers. Decimals indicate an algorithm was used to choose the winner. I rounded the numbers in the vote information for the governor’s race. It was in fact in decimal places, just like the Michigan evidence in the exhibit. This is another red flag that indicates the outcome of the governor’s race is suspect and an audit is necessary. The same source was used.

Update 2:
Breakdown of votes

It seems unlikely that Cooper would receive 75% of mail-in votes considering how much Forest exceeded votes in early vote and election day counts. All mail in votes should be audited.
Update: Attorney, Sidney Powell references possible governor, congressional races impacted by the fraud and now lists North Carolina as a state “in question.” She urges people to demand an audit in the affected states.
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

States in Question
Like this:
Like Loading...