The following summaries were obtained from Travis Kircher’s blog. He has been attending the trial and blogging about key testimony. I haven’t included everything here, only brief summaries.
Prosecution Witness #1: Andrew Lee
“Get everybody out there to my house now!” Camm shouted on the recording when Lee eventually picked up. “My wife and my kids are dead!” After the recording was played, Lee was questioned on the witness stand by the prosecution. He was asked if it was strange that Camm demanded to speak to the post command, rather than simply calling 911. “I think the dispatcher could have handled the situation without having to transfer the call to me,” he said.
Later on cross examination by defense attorney Stacy Uliana, he would admit that, “as a trooper, you dial the numbers instinctively for post a whole lot.”
Prosecution Witness #2: Patricia Brown
Next, jurors were read testimony by Patricia Brown, the post dispatcher who took the call (Brown is currently hospitalized and unable to give testimony in person). Through the written word, Brown testified that she had trouble finding David Camm’s address because he had called the ISP post command instead of regular dispatchers. “At the time, we just needed to get him help,” she said. “But we needed an address. I didn’t know his address.” She said she lost five minutes of time before she was able to nail down a location for Camm’s Georgetown home.
Defense countered by trying to show that Camm was in emotional distress. “Dave was very upset in the phone call, wasn’t he?” Uliana asked. “I suppose he was upset,” Brown replied, before adding later, “there’s different types of upset.”
Prosecution Witness #3: James Niemeyer – crime scene investigator
He told the jury that he shot video of the crime scene – and that graphic video was played for the jurors. There was no sound, but it showed the interior of the garage where the murders took place.
Under cross examination, Niemeyer told the jury that then Prosecutor Stan Faith hired blood stain pattern expert Rod Englert, who dispatched his protégé, Rob Stites, to the scene. Niemeyer said he resented Stites, but added that, “I don’t think he really hurt anything.” “I had a problem with Mr. Stites,” he said. “I didn’t appreciate him being there.” He said Stites came all the way from Oregon but failed to bring a kit to test blood, and later seized part of a garage door that he believed contained blood stains, despite the fact that a phenolphthalein test eliminated blood as a possibility.
Uliana then had Niemeyer recall taking a palm print approximately 1′-9″ from the top of Kim Camm’s Ford Bronco, which was found in the garage at the murder scene. That palm print was later traced to Charles Boney, who would eventually be convicted for the three murders. “You hit a home run, didn’t you?” Uliana said.
Uliana pointed out that, contrary to procedure, the rolls of film containing pictures of the crime scene were not sent to an Indiana State Police lab, but instead to a commercial 24-hour film developing facility. As a result, she said the “identifiers” – the tags used to mark each picture with the time, date and location it was taken – were lost.
Uliana then challenged Niemeyer’s ability to keep an open mind about the investigation. She took him back to when he first arrived at the crime scene and was standing outside the garage.
“And you made the determination at this point that this was a David Camm crime scene,” she said. “That is incorrect.” He was then presented with a statement from a prior proceeding in which he said he knew, “this was David Camm’s crime.” “And you thought it even before you went inside David Camm’s home,” Uliana said. Before he took pictures, or videos, or fingerprints.
“That’s correct,” Niemeyer replied. Later, when questioned by Special Prosecutor Stan Levco, he would explain himself: “When I walked up and looked through the garage door, things went through my mind,” he added. He said he didn’t think the suspect was a burglar.
“Does a burglar shoot a woman and two children?” he asked. “You’ve got two exits.” He added that he believed Kim’s attacker was known to her, because if it was a complete stranger, “all she would have to do was put the vehicle in reverse and blow it.” “She knew him and she wasn’t afraid of him,” he said. “I was convinced David was involved.” Uliana would later mock these hunches as, “great theories that you came up with in five minutes” and point out that people do get shot during robberies.
1) What was the caliber of the shell casings found at the scene? (.380)
2) Was it possible that what had been reported as a mixture of blood and serum found streaming from Kim Camm’s head could be something else, such as blood and urine? (Niemeyer wasn’t able to answer.)
Prosecution Witness #4: James Bube
The prosecutors presented the jury with 2D renderings of a 3D image Bube created of the interior of the Camm’s garage and home. He also created a diagram of the murder scene, showing the bodies of Kim and Brad Camm on the ground outside the Bronco.
Upon cross examination, Uliana pointed out that the shooting happened in the garage, “but you still took the time to document the inside of the house – and to do it right.” Bube agreed.
Prosecution Witness #5: Charlie McDaniel
Charlie McDaniel is a 26-year veteran of the Indiana State Police, who serves in the area of crime scene investigation. He told the court that he supervised the transportation of the Kim Camm’s Ford Bronco here to Lebanon, Ind. specifically for this trial. Special Prosecutor Stan Levco asked him if the front passenger side seat was working in the sense that it could be pushed forward and back. McDaniel said that, “sometimes I could get it to work. Most of the time I could not.”
Levco then submitted into evidence numerous fiber samples he had taken from the carpet in various areas of the Camm home. Defense attorney Stacy Uliana pointed out that those fibers had been collected in 2005, years after the murders, with new residents living in the home. Videos taken by McDaniel of the interior and exterior of the Georgetown Community Church gym were also submitted into evidence. In prior trials, 10 witnesses testified that they were playing basketball with David Camm at the gym during the time of the murders. “Did you count the number of exits there are from the building?” Levco asked. “There are nine exterior exits,” McDaniel said.
“Were you ordered to take carpet samples from any other house?” she asked. “No I was not,” he replied. Upon questioning, he told her he was never asked to take carpet samples from Charles Boney’s house.
He was also questioned about whether he had requested any surveillance video from a golf course that was nearby the Georgetown Community Church gym. He testified that he had not, and was not aware that there were any surveillance cameras at the golf course.
Juror’s questions –
Were there time locks on the gym doors – he wasn’t aware of any.
Were there cameras on the outside of the gym – he didn’t recall.
Prosecution Witness #6: John Galloway (neighbor)
He said that on the night of the murders, he and his wife were driving to dinner when they passed Camm at an intersection at roughly 5 p.m.
He also testified that at 7:30 that evening, he was back home watching Jeopardy, when he believed he saw Kim Camm’s vehicle pull onto Lockhart Road to go home.
Juror’s questions –
Asked if he had seen David Camm’s vehicle pull onto the street shortly before Kim Camm’s vehicle did. He said he did not, but he may have missed it.
Prosecution Witness #7: Brandon W. Beaven (neighbor)
“Were you at school that day?” Meyer asked. “I did not go to school that day,” Beaven replied, to some laughter. He explained that his car wasn’t working, and he convinced his mom into letting him stay home from school to work on it. He said he spent most of the day on his back tucked under the rear fender, until roughly 4:30 or 5:00 p.m., and saw several cars go by.
“There was one vehicle that stood out that I did not recognize,” at 1 p.m. or 1:30 p.m., he said. He described it as a “dark colored Cadillac” that didn’t have Indiana license plates. He said when it past him the first time, it was driving normally, but when it came back, driving in the opposite direction, it was traveling “at a high rate of speed.”
He said there may have been a passenger in the vehicle the second time it passed by, but he wasn’t sure.
Kammen showed him a photograph that police presented him with in 2005 – a photograph of a maroon colored Cadillac with gold trim on the wheels. When asked whether it was the same car he saw on the afternoon of Sept. 28, 2000, Beaven said that it was similar.
Prosecution Witness #8: Deborah Aven – Kim Camm acquaintance
Aven was at swim lessons with her kids, talked to Kim. She said she left around 7:15 p.m.
Prosecution Witness #9: Rob Steier – Schwann’s driver
Steier testified that on Sept. 28, 2000, he showed up at the Camm residence to take delivery orders. He arrived at approximately 6:35 p.m. and David Camm answered the door. “As best as I can remember, he was wearing gym shorts,” Steier said. Steier testified that Camm told him he was going to play basketball at “an underground church” at 7 p.m. He also testified that Camm offered up this information spontaneously, and not in response to any question.
Prosecution Witness #10: Mark Slaughter – detective with Floyd County police
Slaughter said during the investigation that night, Detective Gary Gilbert gave him the responsibility of transporting David Camm to the Indiana State Police Sellersburg Post – roughly 15 miles from Camm’s home – for questioning. “Did you notice anything unusual about Mr. Camm?” Special Prosecutor Steve Levco asked. Slaughter said “he was visibly upset.” “I did notice a spot on his shoe,” he added. “It was a dark colored spot on his right shoe…it could have been a blood stain.”
Prosecution Witness #11 – Lynn Scamahorn – former DNA analyst for ISP
- DNA and blood from Kim and 7-year-old Brad Camm were found on a sweatshirt worn by Charles Boney, as well as DNA from Boney’s ex-girlfriend Mala Mattingly.
- DNA and blood from 5-year-old Jill and Brad were found on a t-shirt worn by David Camm on the night of the murders. No DNA from Kim Camm was found on that shirt.
- Kim’s DNA and blood were found on one of David Camm’s shoes and on a sock.
- Camm’s DNA was found in sperm in Kim’s underwear.
- fingernail was found in the right front floorboard of the Ford Bronco
- Tests showed that the fingernail did not belong to David, Brad or Jill Camm, and was consistent with the DNA of Kim Camm.
- In Area 40 and Area 23 of the t-shirt – located on the back of the t-shirt, near the right-hand side – Scamahorn found DNA consistent with Jill Camm. In total she found Jill’s blood in four areas of the t-shirt
- Bradley Camm’s blood found in 4-5 areas of Camm’s t-shirt, specifically on the chest area
- No blood was found on the gym shorts Camm was wearing that night
- Scamahorn did two rounds of DNA testing on the sweatshirt. The first round took place in Sept. 2001, and she found unidentified female DNA on the sweatshirt, near the hem of the shirt as well as near the upper left shoulder. That DNA would later be traced to Mala Singh Mattingly.
- Bradley’s DNA was discovered on the shirt
- Kim’s was found on the left sleeve of Boney’s shirt.
- Charles Boney’s DNA was discovered on the sweatshirt, near the collar.
- David Camm’s DNA not on the sweatshirt.
Was this a typical DNA investigation? “I would say it’s typical of a murder case with a lot of evidence. This is a very large case.”
Was the fingernail found in the right front floorboard of the Bronco consistent with being torn, or clipped? “That’s not something I can make a judgment call on,”
Was DNA from either Charles Boney or his girlfriend, Mala Singh Mattingly, found on the fingernail clippings from Kim Camm? “No to both of those.”
Why was the DNA on the collar of the sweatshirt – DNA that was eventually traced to Charles Boney – not run through the FBI Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) until after David Camm’s first trial. Scamahorn: said she was unaware of DNA on the collar, and that she never tested the collar in 2001 because there was writing on it (the word “Backbone”) and she didn’t want to destroy the writing.
Uliana pointed out that, had then-Prosecutor Stan Faith shown her the DNA, she would have tested it – and found Boney years earlier.
Scamahorn was questioned outside the presence of the jury -
Uliana presented Scamahorn with a document and asked her to describe it.
“It’s a letter that I wrote regarding the first trial and the prosecutor,” she said.
Scamahorn said that the first prosecutor – Stan Faith – called her into a private meeting in his office during a break from her testimony in the first trial. He then allegedly demanded that Scamahorn testify that she found David Camm’s DNA on the mysterious gray sweatshirt that, years later, would be traced to Boney. Scamahorn said she couldn’t do this because the facts didn’t back it up.
“He was not pleasant, I would say,” Scamahorn said.
“He cursed at you?” Uliana asked.
“And he wanted you to say things that you felt were beyond science?” Uliana asked.
“Yes,” Scamahorn said, adding, “he was very much not happy with me.”
Scamahorn said Faith threatened to contact her superiors and that it was “definitely implied” that her job was being threatened. She also said Faith threatened to charge her with obstruction of justice if she didn’t testify to what he wanted.
Uliana asked if she thought Faith was trying to wrongfully influence her to testify to facts that were beyond science.
“Possibly. Possibly. Yeah.”
“He did threaten your job,” Uliana said.
“That is true.”
“And he did threaten to charge you with a felony,” Uliana added.
“That is true,” Scamahorn replied.
Prosecution witness #12: Shelly Romero (Former K-9 Handler for Indiana State Police)
She then saw David Camm at the scene and hugged him. “He said, ‘Somebody’s killed my f—ing family!’” Romero testified. “When I first arrived, he was real quiet, kind of withdrawn, like he didn’t want to be there,” she said.
She said he also brought up the moment he gave CPR to his son Brad, after finding his body in the Bronco. “He said that blood was just coming out of Bradley’s mouth, and he didn’t know whether to savor it or spit it out.”
Then, Romero said, his thoughts turned to himself. “At one point, he asked, ‘Who would be interested in me?’” Romero said. She said Camm was concerned that a man whose wife and kids had been murdered would not be datable. Camm would eventually be arrested, but Romero said he wouldn’t be the only person under suspicion. She said about a week after he was arrested, the police executed a search warrant at her home, and she spent the next year submitting blood and DNA samples for tests.
Kammen questioned her about her opinion of Camm’s arrest. “You questioned the quality of the investigation,” Kammen said. “You thought things moved a little quickly.” “Yes,” she replied, adding that she became a “black sheep” in the department for questioning the investigation. She said she was suspended a few days after going to the funeral. The reason, according to Romero? She claims she was punished for making a modification to her K-9′s cage. “You felt like they were making an example of you?” Kammen asked. “Yes sir.”
Prosecution Witness #13 Janice Renn (Kim Camm’s mother)
Meyer asked her to call the events of Sept. 28, 2000 – the day of the murders. Renn said it was the last day she saw Kim, Brad and Jill alive. “I picked up Brad to take him to get his allergy shot,” Renn said, adding that Kim was going to pick Jill up from dance class. “He [Brad] was hungry, as always, so I gave him a snack,” Renn said. She said he did his homework, and then “he watched some TV.”
At about 5:40, Renn said Kim showed up with Jill, to pick Brad up. Renn said Jill was hungry, so she made her a bag of cookies, while Kim munched on crackers.
Camm’s defense team had no questions for Renn.
Prosecution witness: James Biddle (Retired Lieutenant for Indiana State Police)
He later discovered that Camm and his uncle, Sam Lockhart, had arrived at the home and wanted to go inside to get some property. Biddle said Camm was told that the home was still a crime scene.
“He said something to the effect of, ‘Jim, we just want to get into the house to get those things,’” Biddle recalled. Biddle refused to let him in. That’s when, he said, Camm “chest bumped” him. Prosecutors asked if it was an accident. “No sir, it was not an accident,” Biddle said.
The prosecution also played the audio of the phone call between David and Biddle. There was nothing incriminating there, but here is the link to Kircher’s blog if you want to read the highlights.
Cross: Kammen questioned the role of Sean Clemons, the lead investigator of the case. Kammen asked if Biddle kept Clemons as lead investigator, because he had a “good relationship” with Stan Faith, who was then the Floyd County Prosecutor. Biddle replied that “that’s part” of the reason, but when asked if the investigation deferred to the wishes of Faith throughout the case, he replied, “that’s not true.”
Kammen then asked Biddle about “the infamous gray sweatshirt that was found at the scene” – the sweatshirt that bore the name “Backbone” in the collar and, years later, was tied to Charles Boney, Camm’s alleged accomplice in the murders. Biddle said Camm’s family was told about the sweatshirt but, “I don’t recall if they were given the name.” He also testified that no one ran the nickname “Backbone” through a database of nicknames maintained by the Department of Corrections.
Biddle said, Stites identified what he believed to be “high velocity impact spatter” on Camm’s t-shirt. (High velocity impact spatter is a technical term. Experts say it consists of microscopic blood droplets that only appear when a person is standing less than four feet away from a victim when they are shot by a gun.) It was discovery that led to Camm’s arrest, according to Biddle. “The prosecutor made the decision to arrest Camm, is that true?” Kammen asked. Biddle said that it was.
Biddle lied to Dave during their phone conversation: “Yes, I was lying,” Biddle admitted, referring to the fact that he knew Camm was about to be arrested the whole time. Was he lying all throughout the call? “Several times during that conversation, yes,” Biddle said.
Prosecution Witness: Frank Loop – Member of the Floyd County Sheriff’s Department
Loop testified briefly about a conversation he allegedly had around April or May of 2000, months before the murders. Loop said Camm told him he had a .380, but he wanted to get his money together to purchase a Beretta.
Kammen rose to cross examine Loop. He noted that Loop, like Stan Faith, had “also been involved in politics.” “I’m currently the elected township trustee,” Loop said. Kammen also pointed out that Loop ran for sheriff in 2005, and in 1999, was on the town board. “By December , you heard through the law enforcement grapevine that a .380 might have been used in the murders,” Kammen said. “That is true,” Loop replied.
Prosecution Witness: Susan Block (Semonin Realtors Broker – New Albany, Indiana)
She testified about a phone call she allegedly received from David Camm the day before the murders about a listing at 1010 Woodfield Drive in New Albany. She said the 4-bedroom, 3.5-bathroom single residence home was listed for $189,900. “Basically, he was just asking about the property, so I gave him the information on it,” she said. She said she never got any indication that Camm had discussed it with his wife Kim.
Upon cross examination, she said Camm told her he would possibly look at the home that upcoming weekend, and that he’d discussed with her that the home was five minutes from Graceland Schools. She said he was hoping to move his children closer to the school, and there were several families in the neighborhood.
Prosecution Witness: Robert M. Neal Indiana State Police Trooper
Robert M. Neal, an Indiana State Police trooper had previously served as a crime scene investigator. He testified that in Sept. 2000, he was a detective squad leader in the Sellersburg district and he knew David Camm. He said he was called at home on Sept. 28, 2000 after the bodies of Kim, Brad and Jill were discovered. He then drove to the scene. Neal said the decision was made that Camm should be taken to the Indiana State Police Sellersburg post to be interviewed – not because he was a suspect, but for the purpose of tracking down leads. They arrived at the ISP post shortly after midnight, Neal said, and an audio recording of the interview was made. That audio – with some redactions – was played for the jury. Partial transcript can be found here.